JD
CASE
Subscribe

Week 3

Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4

DEN beat LA after falling to 9% win probability

The swing: M.Stafford pass short left intended for K.Williams — INTERCEPTED, RETURNED FOR TD

What happened

Closest calls

11% lowest win probability

LV beat NO after nearly losing it

The swing: T.Shough pass short left intended for B.Lance — INTERCEPTED

18% lowest win probability

LAC let BUF off the hook

The swing: J.Allen pass short left to T.Johnson for 43 yards — TOUCHDOWN

20% lowest win probability

BAL came back to beat DAL

The swing: L.Jackson pass short middle to M.Hibner for 2 yards — TOUCHDOWN

Wildest games

6 lead changes

Nothing stayed decided in LA at DEN

The winner fell to 9%. 2.18 bits of surprise.

5 lead changes

BAL and DAL traded control all game

The winner fell to 20%. 1.92 bits of surprise.

9 lead changes

CIN at PIT kept changing its mind

The winner fell to 30%. 1.89 bits of surprise.

Tightest games

86% of plays in doubt

CIN at PIT stayed in doubt almost to the end

9 lead changes

85% of plays in doubt

BAL at DAL was close throughout

5 lead changes

87% of plays in doubt

No lead was safe in MIN at TB

3 lead changes

Results that ran against the play

21% chance from production

DEN beat LA despite being outplayed

Final margin 4

58% chance from production

BUF beat LAC in a game that could have gone either way

Final margin 8

Outplayed and lost

+1.1 CASE edge, and a loss

LA outplayed DEN and lost

−0.5 CASE to −1.6, and lost 26-30

Plays that impacted games

−3.0 Contested CASE

R.Dixon punts 41 yards to MIN 14. M.Price for 86 yards — TOUCHDOWN

TB, 9:00 in Q1, with the game within one score

+2.9 Contested CASE

B.Purdy pass short left to M.Evans to SF 20 for 2 yards. Lateral to D.Samuel for 80 yards — TOUCHDOWN

SF, 8:40 in Q1, with the game within one score

+2.1 Contested CASE

A.Rodgers pass deep left to R.Wilson for 38 yards — TOUCHDOWN

PIT, 13:17 in Q1, with the game within one score

This week's teams

Best offenses

+0.46 Contested CASE per play

SF's offense against ARI

59 plays, +21.7 CASE, +0.384 EPA per play

+0.30 Contested CASE per play

CIN had no answer for PIT

68 plays, +16.1 CASE, +0.289 EPA per play

+0.21 Contested CASE per play

LV had its way with NO

74 plays, +14.2 CASE, +0.138 EPA per play

Offenses that stalled

−0.25 Contested CASE per play

Nothing worked for NE against JAX

70 plays, −14.1 CASE, −0.271 EPA per play

−0.23 Contested CASE per play

TB's offense stalled against MIN

81 plays, −17.7 CASE, −0.282 EPA per play

−0.22 Contested CASE per play

NYG shut down TEN

67 plays, −5.9 CASE, −0.127 EPA per play

Where the situation changed the story

9 places apart

NO did more than its raw numbers show

14th by CASE, 23rd by EPA, against LV

7 places apart

CAR's production came when it mattered least

24th by CASE, 17th by EPA, against CLE

4 places apart

CLE's week looks worse once the situation counts

18th by CASE, 14th by EPA, against CAR

On the move

↑9 places

PIT climbed to 22nd

−0.003 Contested CASE per play, season to date

↓9 places

NE slid to 27th

−0.056 Contested CASE per play, season to date

↑9 places

NO is up to 18th

+0.007 Contested CASE per play, season to date

What comes next

How each team's record stacks up against how it's actually played. Early in the season, take this with a big grain of salt.

Records can lie

+1.0 wins against production

DEN's record is ahead of how it has played

2–1, playing like 1.0 wins — 3 games in, an early read

+1.0 wins against production

MIN has won more than its play suggests

3–0, playing like 2.0 wins — 3 games in, an early read

+0.8 wins against production

CLE's wins have outrun its play

2–1, playing like 1.2 wins — 3 games in, an early read

−0.8 wins against production

LA has played better than its record

1–2, playing like 1.8 wins — 3 games in, an early read

−0.7 wins against production

TB's record undersells it

0–3, playing like 0.7 wins — 3 games in, an early read

−0.7 wins against production

NYJ's play has outrun its record

1–2, playing like 1.7 wins — 3 games in, an early read

Week 4, by BASE CASE: two good teams, close

55% LV

KC at LV

Both in the top 12 by net Contested CASE (#3 and #4). BASE CASE: LV 55%.

52% JAX

JAX at CIN

Both in the top 12 by net Contested CASE (#2 and #6). BASE CASE: JAX 52%.

Week 4, by BASE CASE: the mismatches

78% MIN

MIA at MIN

BASE CASE: MIN 78%. By net Contested CASE, #9 against #32.

78% SF

DEN at SF

BASE CASE: SF 78%. By net Contested CASE, #1 against #20.

Leaders

Quarterbacks

+13.4 Contested CASE

B.Purdy, SF

89 plays, +0.58 per play

+10.2 Contested CASE

J.Allen, BUF

102 plays, +0.35 per play

+9.2 Contested CASE

L.Jackson, BAL

90 plays, +0.38 per play

Rushers

+3.9 Contested CASE

J.Allen, BUF

28 plays, +0.59 per play

+3.8 Contested CASE

K.Walker, KC

65 plays, +0.19 per play

+2.8 Contested CASE

L.Jackson, BAL

17 plays, +0.75 per play

Receivers

+7.4 Contested CASE

J.Smith-Njigba, SEA

36 plays, +0.69 per play

+7.4 Contested CASE

C.Lamb, DAL

26 plays, +1.05 per play

+6.5 Contested CASE

M.Evans, SF

16 plays, +1.34 per play